Purpose
Why this agent exists
Most AI agents are defined by what they can do — tools, APIs, access. Role Agents are defined by what they’re responsible for — purpose, boundaries, escalation rules, and a human steward.
The problem
Teams deploy AI agents with vague mandates: “handle customer questions,” “monitor performance,” “draft reports.” Without clear role boundaries, these agents overlap, miss edge cases, and nobody knows who’s accountable when they get it wrong. The missing piece isn’t better models — it’s better role design.
The framework
Eight dimensions that make an AI agent legible, accountable, and steerable:
Why this agent exists
What it owns and delivers
What it consumes and produces
Systems it can access
What it may recommend vs. decide
When and how it hands off to humans
Who oversees and is accountable
How you know it’s working
In practice
Early prototype
Describe what you need. Tribre AI asks the right role-design questions. You get a structured definition you can refine.
We need an agent that reviews our customer support tickets weekly and flags patterns the product team should know about.
I’ll help you design that. What systems does it need access to? (e.g., Zendesk, Intercom, a shared inbox)
Zendesk and our Notion wiki for context. It should produce a weekly brief in Slack.
Got it. Who should be the human steward — the person accountable when the agent flags something sensitive or ambiguous?
Sarah, our Head of Product.
Here’s your Role Agent definition. I’ve drafted all 8 dimensions — review and refine anything that doesn’t feel right.
Part of the system
Agents appear alongside human roles in team views
Understand which of your tasks might become an agent’s job
Role Agents are stages 4–5 on the AI maturity path